Thank you for agreeing to be one of our reviewers. We are keen to ensure a high standard of papers for our conferences and the paper that is being sent to you has been submitted after a first selection process based on this author/s abstract. In general the standard of papers forwarded to us after the vetting of abstracts is good, but occasionally some weaker papers are also accepted for review. We are eager to help authors who may not yet have achieved a suitable skill in writing academic papers to the necessary quality. To this end we would be grateful if you would, wherever possible, provide constructive advice as to how they can make the paper more acceptable for presentation at a quality academic conference.
The conference committee would therefore be grateful if you would complete the table and rate the paper on the issues described below. As with all double-blind reviewing any comments you make will be passed to the authors on an anonymous basis.